Skip to content
GullySales

You can tell which partners are performing, long before the year ends.

Gully Sales gives every dealer, distributor and reseller an objective they have agreed to, one scorecard published on the same date each month, and a review where a slipping partner is acted on rather than noted.

  • An objective per partner, not one network target copied onto everybody.
  • One scorecard, published monthly, that your managers and partners both accept.
  • A written corrective step whenever a partner slips, with an owner and a date.
Book a free auditTalk to us

Gully Sales Private Limited works with businesses across India that sell through dealers, distributors, resellers and franchise partners.

In one paragraph

What is Channel Performance Management?

Channel performance management is the routine by which you set, measure and act on what each partner delivers. Gully Sales agrees an objective for every dealer, distributor or reseller, builds one scorecard covering pipeline, sell-through and activity quality, fixes the review calendar, and defines the corrective step that follows a miss.

The problem

Your channel is reported on, but it is not managed.

You have partners. Somebody sends a sales figure at month end, usually a total, sometimes a list by party. The strong partners are known by name and the weak ones by a vague feeling. Between them sits a middle group nobody looks at closely, because there is no agreed way to look. When the year runs short, the response is a scheme, a discount or a push on the two partners who were already going to buy. Nothing about that is unusual. It is what happens when a channel grows faster than the routine used to run it.

You will recognise it as

  • You know what each partner bought from you, and not what any of them sold onward.
  • The partner target is a single network number divided by convenience, not agreed party by party.
  • Partner reviews happen when a problem appears, or when a manager happens to be travelling that way.
  • Two partners in the same tier are treated identically, though one has half the market of the other.
  • A partner has been sliding for three quarters and the first written note about it is the renewal letter.
  • When a partner is asked why the number fell, the answer is the market, and nobody has evidence to reply with.

What it costs the business

  • Growth comes from the same few partners every year, so your revenue quietly depends on three phone numbers.
  • Schemes are spent on partners who would have bought anyway, because there is no evidence of who responds.
  • Weak partners hold territories they cannot serve, and a better partner in that district is never approached.
  • Your managers spend the month collecting numbers instead of using them, and the review becomes a reading exercise.
  • A partner leaves without warning, and the accounts, stock and end customers in that district go with them.

Why it persists. Partner data is awkward. Primary sales sit in your accounting system, secondary sales sit with the partner, activity sits in a manager's head, and none of the three agree. A comparable view feels like a data project nobody has time to run. The partner is also a customer, so a hard performance conversation feels like a commercial risk. It is easier to keep the relationship warm and hope the number recovers. That instinct is understandable, and it lets a quiet decline run for a year.

If it stays unresolved. The channel keeps expanding by appointment rather than by productivity. You add partners because coverage looks thin, when the real problem is that the partners already appointed work at a fraction of what their territory holds. Cost of service rises, margin goes into schemes, and the network gets harder to fix each year, because nobody can prove which partners deserve investment.

What changes

A slipping partner shows up in the first month, not at the year end.

In the first weeks

  • Every partner has a written objective and knows the measures it will be judged on.
  • One scorecard replaces the arguments about whose sales figure is correct.
  • Your managers walk into partner meetings with the same page the partner is holding.

In how the work runs

  • Reviews happen on a published calendar instead of when a problem forces one.
  • A partner falling behind triggers a named action, an owner and a date, not a discussion.
  • Field activity is recorded consistently, so effort and result can be read together.

In sales and marketing

  • Scheme and support money goes to partners whose numbers show they respond to it.
  • Weak territories are identified early enough to develop, restructure or reassign them.
  • Forecasts rest on partner pipeline and stock position rather than on last year plus a percentage.

In what management can see

  • Leadership sees partner performance by tier and territory on one monthly page.
  • Partners can see exactly where they stand against their own agreed number.

Over the longer term

  • The channel grows by making appointed partners productive, not only by adding more of them.
  • Performance conversations become routine, so they stop being treated as confrontation.

Gully Sales controls the objectives, the scorecard, the review structure, the corrective ladder and the reporting. What partners sell then depends on your product, price, service, stock and the market. We build the system that surfaces a problem early and forces a decision, not a sales number.

Who it is for

This is for businesses already selling through partners.

The businesses it suits

  • Manufacturers selling through dealers or distributors across several districts or states.
  • B2B companies whose resellers and system partners bring a meaningful share of orders.
  • Franchisors who need a common performance standard across franchisee-run outlets.
  • Brands with a referral or affiliate network whose contribution has never been measured.
  • Companies whose channel has grown past the point where one person can hold it in memory.
  • Businesses appointing a channel head, and needing a routine that person can inherit.

What usually prompts the call

  • Channel revenue is flat while the partner count keeps rising.
  • A large partner has slipped for several quarters and nothing was recorded.
  • You are about to fund a scheme and cannot say which partners it should target.
  • A channel manager is leaving and the partner picture lives in that person's head.
  • Leadership has asked for partner-wise performance and nobody can produce it on one page.

What Gully Sales does

The work, component by component.

Partner objectives

We set what each partner is expected to deliver, party by party, using its territory size, product mix, existing accounts and capacity rather than a single network number. Objectives cover volume, mix, coverage and a small set of activities. Each one is discussed with the partner and recorded as agreed, so the number is not something that arrived by email.

Why it matters:
A target nobody agreed to is a target nobody defends. Partner-wise objectives make the later performance conversation possible, because both sides already know what was expected.
You receive:
An objective sheet per partner covering volume, mix, coverage and agreed activities for the year.
Business value:
Every partner is measured against its own market, so a small partner performing well is no longer hidden behind a large one coasting.

The channel scorecard

One page per partner, with the same measures for every partner in a tier, built from data you can actually get: your dispatch and invoice records, whatever secondary data partners share, and the field activity your managers record. It shows the current month, the trend, the position against objective, and the two or three things to discuss.

Why it matters:
Most channel reporting is a spreadsheet nobody reads. A short, standard page makes performance comparable across the network and survives a change of manager.
You receive:
A partner scorecard template plus a populated scorecard for every partner in the first cycle.
Business value:
The monthly conversation starts from an agreed picture, so meeting time goes into decisions rather than into reconciling numbers.

Pipeline and sell-through

We add the forward view most channels lack: what the partner has in hand for the coming period, what stock is sitting with it, and what it has sold onward to end customers wherever secondary data can be collected. Where partners will not share full secondary data, we agree a workable proxy and state its limits plainly.

Why it matters:
Primary sales tell you what a partner bought, which can be a scheme response rather than demand. Sell-through and pipeline tell you whether the market is actually moving.
You receive:
A partner pipeline and stock format, with an agreed secondary sales collection method per partner type.
Business value:
You see a slowdown while there is still time to respond, instead of discovering it when a partner stops ordering.

Activity quality

We define the handful of leading actions that precede orders in your category: customer visits, demonstrations, quotations issued, follow-up speed, display and stocking standards, service response, or engineer availability. These are recorded in a light format your managers can complete during the visit rather than afterwards.

Why it matters:
Sales figures are a lagging measure. If only the result is managed, you learn about a weak quarter after it is finished, and cannot say what to change.
You receive:
An activity standard by partner type, with a visit format and a monthly activity summary.
Business value:
Managers can coach the behaviour that produces orders, rather than repeating the shortfall back to the partner.

The review cadence

We fix the calendar: a short monthly performance review per partner, a fuller quarterly business review with the partner's decision maker, and an annual reset of objectives and terms. Each has a fixed agenda, a pack that is prepared from the scorecard, a note of decisions and an owner for each action.

Why it matters:
Reviews that are scheduled only when there is a problem arrive too late and feel like a summons. A published calendar makes the discussion ordinary.
You receive:
A twelve-month review calendar, standard agendas, meeting packs and an action log format.
Business value:
Performance is discussed twelve times a year instead of once, so small corrections replace large annual arguments.

Corrective action

We write the ladder that follows a shortfall, so the response is a policy rather than a mood: an observation noted, then a joint improvement plan with specific actions and a review date, then a change of support, territory or terms, and finally a documented exit. Each rung names who decides, what evidence is needed and how long the partner has.

Why it matters:
Without a written ladder, weak performance is either ignored for a year or answered suddenly with a termination letter. Both damage the network.
You receive:
A corrective action ladder, an improvement plan template and a register of open performance actions.
Business value:
Partners are treated consistently and can see how to recover, which protects the relationships you want to keep.

Incentives and partner development

We connect the scorecard to what a partner earns and receives. Support, training, leads, marketing funds and scheme eligibility are tied to measured performance and to the development need the scorecard reveals, whether that is a salesperson to be trained, a product line never sold, or a service gap holding the territory back.

Why it matters:
When investment is spread evenly, it rewards the partners who need it least. Tying it to the scorecard makes the money purposeful and gives partners a reason to engage with the review.
You receive:
A partner development plan per priority partner and a scorecard-linked support and eligibility matrix.
Business value:
Your channel spend moves toward partners who convert support into sales, and weak partners get help before they get a warning.

What you will have at the end.

  • A channel performance baseline: current partner-wise sales, coverage, activity and data gaps.
  • An objective sheet per partner, agreed with the partner, covering volume, mix, coverage and activity.
  • A partner scorecard template, plus completed scorecards for the whole network in the first cycle.
  • A partner pipeline and stock format, with an agreed secondary sales collection method.
  • An activity standard and visit format by partner type, with a monthly activity summary.
  • A twelve-month review calendar with monthly, quarterly and annual agendas and meeting packs.
  • A corrective action ladder, an improvement plan template and an open action register.
  • A tier-wise channel dashboard for leadership, showing performance by territory and partner type.
  • A partner development and support matrix linking measured performance to eligibility.
  • A data source note stating where every number comes from and how disputes are settled.
  • A written manager guide for running the review, with a worked sample scorecard and agenda.
  • A training session for your channel managers, and a handover pack so the routine survives a transfer.

How it runs

The engagement, step by step.

  1. 1

    Baseline the channel as it stands

    We read what already exists: partner-wise sales for the last twelve to twenty-four months, the partner list with territories and terms, any secondary data, current reporting formats and the last few review notes. We speak to your channel managers about how partners are handled today, and identify which numbers can be produced reliably and which cannot.

    You provide:
    Sales history by partner, the partner master with territories and terms, existing reports, and access to your channel managers.
    We produce:
    A baseline note: partner-wise performance, coverage picture, data available and data missing, with the gaps named.
    Done when:
    You and we agree what can be measured now, and what will need a collection method built.
  2. 2

    Set objectives partner by partner

    We work with your channel head to set an objective for each partner, weighing territory potential, product mix, existing accounts, capacity and history rather than dividing a national number. Tiers get common measures; individual partners get their own values. Anything a partner cannot influence is kept out of the objective.

    You provide:
    Your growth plan for the year, territory knowledge, and decisions on tiering and priority partners.
    We produce:
    A draft objective sheet for every partner, with the reasoning recorded beside each number.
    Done when:
    Objectives are signed off internally and ready to be discussed with partners.
  3. 3

    Build the scorecard and fix the data

    We design the scorecard around the data you can genuinely collect each month, define every measure so it cannot be read two ways, and set out where each number comes from. Where secondary sales or stock data is missing, we agree a collection route with the partner types concerned and state clearly what the proxy can and cannot tell you.

    You provide:
    Access to your sales and dispatch data, and a decision on what partners will be asked to share.
    We produce:
    The scorecard format, a measure definition sheet, the data source note and the first populated set.
    Done when:
    The first month of scorecards is produced and accepted as accurate by your team.
  4. 4

    Install the review cadence

    We set the review calendar for the year, write the agendas for the monthly, quarterly and annual meetings, prepare the pack format, and train your channel managers to run a review from the scorecard: what to open with, what to probe, what to record, and how to close with actions rather than assurances.

    You provide:
    Manager availability for training, and leadership commitment to attend quarterly reviews.
    We produce:
    The review calendar, agendas, meeting pack, action log format and a manager guide.
    Done when:
    Every partner has review dates in the calendar and a named owner inside your business.
  5. 5

    Run the first live cycles with your team

    We sit in on real reviews across a representative set of partners: a strong one, a middling one and one that is slipping. We watch how the scorecard is used, adjust measures that are being argued with, and help your managers hold the harder conversations without turning them into confrontation.

    You provide:
    Partner meetings we can join, and honesty about which conversations feel difficult.
    We produce:
    Observations per review, adjustments to the scorecard and agenda, and coaching notes for each manager.
    Done when:
    Two or three full cycles have run and your managers are leading them, not us.
  6. 6

    Open corrective actions and development plans

    The first cycles will identify partners below their objective and partners with clear development needs. We apply the ladder: improvement plans with specific actions and dates for those who can recover, development and support for those held back by capability, and a documented case for those who should be restructured or replaced.

    You provide:
    Decisions on which partners to invest in, which to place on a plan, and which to reconsider.
    We produce:
    Improvement plans, development plans and a register of open performance actions with owners and dates.
    Done when:
    Every partner below objective has a written, owned action rather than a general concern.
  7. 7

    Report, review and hand over

    We produce the leadership view by tier and territory, run a review of the routine itself against the baseline, and hand the whole system to your team with the templates, definitions and guide. We agree what should be checked periodically so the cadence does not decay once we step back.

    You provide:
    A leadership session to review the first period, and the person who will own the routine.
    We produce:
    The leadership dashboard, a performance review against baseline, and the full handover pack.
    Done when:
    Your team runs the next cycle without us, using the same formats and definitions.

Ways to work with us

Build the scorecard, or run the review cycle with your channel team.

Channel performance baseline

A short diagnostic of how your partners are performing and how they are currently managed: partner-wise trends, coverage, data gaps and the reviews actually happening. Ends with a written picture and a recommendation.

Performance management setup

The build: partner objectives, scorecard, pipeline and activity formats, review calendar and agendas, corrective ladder and leadership dashboard, with your channel managers trained to run it after handover.

Managed review cycles

For a defined period we run the monthly and quarterly rhythm alongside your team: scorecards produced, reviews attended, actions chased and leadership reporting written, then a full handover to your people.

Partner turnaround support

For a named set of underperforming partners, we run the diagnosis, build the improvement or development plan with them, and review progress until the partner recovers or the decision to change is documented.

Channel manager transition cover

When a channel manager moves on, we keep the scorecards, reviews and open actions running, and bring the replacement into a live routine rather than an empty inbox.

Why Gully Sales

What you are actually choosing when you choose us.

We build the routine, not only the report

A dashboard changes nothing on its own. The work here is the review that uses it, the manager who can run that review, and the action that follows a miss. We stay until those three exist.

We measure with the data you actually have

Indian channels rarely hand over clean secondary sales. We design around what partners will realistically share, say plainly what a proxy can and cannot show, and improve the data over cycles instead of stalling.

Sales and marketing sit in the same team

Partner performance is rarely only a selling problem. When a territory is weak because demand is not being created, we can see it, because we work on marketing and sales systems together.

We write the difficult parts down

The corrective ladder, the improvement plan and the exit case are the parts most channels avoid drafting. Having them written before they are needed keeps the conversation calm and consistent.

Built for Indian SMB channels

Multi-state dealer networks, sub-dealers, family-run distributors, WhatsApp-based ordering and partial data are the normal case here, not exceptions to be designed around later.

Your team owns it afterwards

Templates, definitions, agendas and a manager guide are handed over, and we train the people who will use them. The routine has to work when we are not in the room.

Where it applies

The same service, in different businesses.

Building materials and hardware

The situation:
A manufacturer sells through dealers across several states. Three dealers drive most of the volume and the rest are known only by their outstanding balance.
How it applies:
Objectives set by district potential, a scorecard covering offtake, stock and counter activity, and monthly reviews run by the area managers.
Likely benefit:
Mid-sized dealers become visible as growth options, and scheme money stops going to the same three parties every quarter.

Industrial equipment and components

The situation:
Channel partners handle both sales and service. Orders are lumpy, and nobody can tell whether a quiet quarter is a partner problem or a market one.
How it applies:
Pipeline and quotation tracking added to the scorecard, with service response and engineer availability measured as activity standards.
Likely benefit:
Leadership can separate a slow market from a slow partner, and support goes where capability is the constraint.

Packaged food and consumer goods

The situation:
Distributors buy to scheme deadlines. Primary sales look healthy while stock builds in the trade and secondary offtake is unknown.
How it applies:
Secondary sales and stock collection agreed with each distributor, with the scorecard reading primary against sell-through.
Likely benefit:
Scheme-driven buying is separated from real consumption, so planning stops being distorted by the last push.

Software and technology resellers

The situation:
A reseller network was appointed enthusiastically. Many partners registered, few have closed anything, and none have been reviewed.
How it applies:
Tiered objectives, a partner pipeline view, certification and activity standards, and a corrective ladder for dormant partners.
Likely benefit:
The network is reduced to the partners who sell, and enablement is aimed at those with a genuine pipeline.

Franchise and multi-outlet retail

The situation:
Franchisee outlets vary widely. Some follow the standard closely, others do not, and comparison is done by feel rather than by measure.
How it applies:
A common outlet scorecard covering sales, mix, display standards and customer experience, reviewed monthly with each franchisee.
Likely benefit:
Standards become measurable across outlets, and support reaches weak franchisees before customers notice the difference.

Healthcare and diagnostics networks

The situation:
Referral partners and channel associates bring patients and orders, but contribution is tracked informally and reciprocity is inconsistent.
How it applies:
Partner-wise contribution measured with a light activity standard and a quarterly review with each significant partner.
Likely benefit:
The partners genuinely contributing are recognised and supported, and dormant ones are re-engaged or released.

Proof

Work we can point to.

HOPO Hardware, premium hardware and fittings

The problem:
Reach needed to grow through a dealer network, with dealer coordination and sales performance to be improved alongside it.
What we did:
Gully Sales supported HOPO Hardware on brand reach, dealer coordination and sales performance for its hardware and fittings range.
Over:
See the case study for the engagement period.
The result:
Improved dealer coordination and sales performance, as recorded in the case study.
Read the case study

Questions buyers ask

Before you enquire, the answers you will want.

Which partner performance indicators should actually drive action?

Four do most of the work. Attainment against an agreed objective tells you where a partner stands. Sell-through or a workable proxy tells you whether the market moved or only the invoice did. Pipeline tells you what is coming. Activity quality tells you why. Volume alone is the weakest of the five, because a scheme can lift it without anything real changing underneath.

How is this different from a dealer or distributor audit?

An audit is an inspection at a point in time: it examines a partner's compliance, records, stock and claims, and produces findings. Channel performance management is the ongoing routine that runs every month afterwards. An audit can tell you a partner is weak. This tells you the same thing earlier, every cycle, with an agreed action attached, and keeps doing so once the auditors have gone.

How long does the engagement take?

The baseline and objective setting usually run first, followed by the scorecard build and the installation of the review calendar. We then sit through two or three live cycles before handover, because a routine has to be practised before it belongs to your team. We do not commit to a timeline before seeing how many partners you have and what data already exists.

What inputs do you need from us?

Partner-wise sales history, the partner master with territories and terms, any existing reports and review notes, and access to your channel managers. Later we need decisions from your channel head on tiering, objectives and which partners to invest in. Time matters more than documents: managers must attend the training and the first reviews, or the routine will not survive handover.

Our partners will not share secondary sales data. Can this still work?

Yes, with honesty about the limits. We agree a proxy that partners will realistically provide, such as stock position, counter sales in a sample, or order patterns read against seasonality, and we state plainly what that proxy cannot tell you. Data usually improves once partners see the scorecard used to allocate support rather than to catch them out.

How is success measured?

Against the baseline we record at the start. Attainment against objective, active partners by tier, coverage, partner pipeline, sell-through where visible, activity completion, and how many performance actions were opened and closed on time. Reporting is monthly against a fixed period, and we say which movements are attributable to the routine and which reflect market or pricing changes.

Do you speak to our partners directly?

Where you want us to, and always alongside your people. We often join objective conversations and the first reviews, because the format is easier to establish with someone in the room who has run it before. The relationship stays yours. Our aim is that your channel manager leads the second cycle and we are simply observing.

What is excluded from the scope?

We do not design your commission and rebate structure, write your channel rules of engagement, recruit new partners, deliver partner training curricula or implement partner portal software. Those are separate pieces of work and we will say so. This engagement sets objectives, builds the scorecard, installs the review cadence and defines the corrective ladder, then hands the routine to your team.

4 more questions

We have no CRM and the data sits in spreadsheets. Is that a problem?

No. Most channels we work with start in spreadsheets and accounting exports. The scorecard is built to be produced from what you already have, with the sources documented so anybody can reproduce it. If you later move to a CRM or partner portal, the definitions carry across, and the routine does not have to be reinvented around the software.

What happens when a partner keeps missing the objective?

The ladder decides, not the mood of the meeting. First the shortfall is recorded and discussed. Then a joint improvement plan is written with specific actions, support and a review date. If it is a capability gap, development comes before pressure. If there is no recovery, the case for changing support, territory or the appointment itself is documented and taken to your leadership.

How does this connect to partner incentives and schemes?

The scorecard becomes the evidence behind them. Eligibility for support, leads, marketing funds and scheme participation is tied to measured performance and to the development need the scorecard reveals. Designing the commission and rebate structure itself is separate work; here we make sure whatever structure you run is applied to numbers both sides accept.

Who runs the routine after you leave?

Your channel head or channel managers, using the templates, measure definitions, agendas and manager guide we hand over. We train them during the live cycles and document how each number is produced, so a transfer of staff does not reset the system. Some clients keep us for a periodic check that the cadence has not quietly decayed.

Talk to us

Plan your channel growth programme around numbers both sides accept.

The free audit is a working session, not a pitch. We look at your partner-wise sales, what coverage you really have, what data exists, and whether you need the full routine, a scorecard alone, or help with a few partners who have been slipping for some time.

  • No obligation and no sales script
  • A reply from someone who does the work
  • Your details are never sold or shared

Your partner list, sales data, terms and margins stay confidential, and are used only to prepare for and conduct the audit.

Protected by reCAPTCHA — Google’s privacy policy and terms apply.

Get a free audit of how you sell, and a scored report of where the work is.

Book a free audit
Book a free audit