Skip to content
← All articles

Notes for owners · Digital marketing

Google Ads vs Meta ads: which platform should you choose?

Google reaches people already looking for what you sell. Meta interrupts people who might want it once they see it.

The GullySales team · Updated 15 Sept 2026 · 6 min read

Rules for this trade differ by state and professional body, and they change. Check the current position with your own council or adviser before you act on anything here.

Editorial illustration for Google Ads vs Meta ads: which platform should you choose?
On this page
  1. The real difference is intent, not the platform
  2. Which platform suits which situation
  3. Where each platform quietly wastes money
  4. A budget order that works for a small business
  5. The numbers to compare, monthly
  6. What to do next

Google Ads reaches people already looking for what you sell, at the moment they look. Meta ads interrupt people on Instagram and Facebook who might want it once they see it. That one difference decides the choice. If demand already exists and people search for your product by name, start with Google. If nobody searches for what you sell, or the decision is visual and emotional, start with Meta. Budget size and how fast your team answers the phone then adjust the answer.

The real difference is intent, not the platform

Somebody typing "root canal treatment Jayanagar" has toothache and a decision to make today. Somebody scrolling Instagram at 10 pm has no such problem. You can still sell them aligners, a sofa, a plot or a yoga membership, but you are creating the want first and collecting the enquiry second.

This affects everything downstream. Google enquiries are fewer, more expensive and closer to buying. Meta enquiries are cheaper, far more numerous and further from buying. Neither number is good or bad on its own. What matters is whether your sales process can handle the kind of enquiry the platform produces.

Which platform suits which situation

Google AdsMeta ads
Buyer state of mindActively searchingPassively scrolling
Best forServices people search by name, urgent needs, B2B sourcing, high-value considered purchasesVisual products, new categories, offers, events, local awareness, retargeting
Typical enquiry qualityHigher, fewerLower, many more
Typical cost per enquiryHigherLower
Creative effortModest, mostly text and landing pagesContinuous, new images and video every few weeks
How fast you must respondWithin minutes, they are comparing nowWithin minutes, or they forget they enquired
What kills itBroad keywords and no negative listCreative fatigue and untargeted forms

For example, a dental clinic in Bengaluru might see an illustrative ₹700 per enquiry from Google search for implants and ₹150 per enquiry from Meta for clear aligners. Both figures are examples only. The clinic still earns more from the Google enquiries, because eight of ten of them wanted treatment. The aligner enquiries need five calls each, and many of them were only curious about the price.

Where each platform quietly wastes money

On Google, the waste is almost always keywords. A broad match campaign for "interior design" collects clicks from students, job seekers, people wanting free plans and people in other cities. The fix is boring and effective. Exact and phrase match on the terms that describe what you sell, and a negative keyword list that grows every week. Location settings restricted to presence in your area rather than interest in it.

On Meta, the waste is creative and audience. The same image running for three months stops working because the same people have seen it too often. Broad interest targeting sends your form to anybody who once liked a page. The fix is a new creative every two to three weeks, one clear offer per audience, and a real exclusion list so you stop paying to reach existing customers.

Both platforms waste money the same way at the end: an enquiry that nobody calls. No targeting improvement rescues a campaign whose leads sit unanswered until the evening.

A budget order that works for a small business

  1. Fix the landing page and the enquiry form first. Sending paid traffic to a slow page with a nine-field form is paying for visits you then discard.
  2. Put someone's name against answering. One person, a stated response time, and a WhatsApp number that works.
  3. Start with the platform that matches your demand. If people search for your service, Google search only, no display, no partner network.
  4. Add retargeting once you have visitors. On Meta it is the cheapest paid enquiry most businesses ever get.
  5. Add the second platform at the eight-week mark, judged on cost per qualified enquiry rather than cost per click.

The numbers to compare, monthly

Not clicks, not reach, not cost per lead alone. Four numbers per platform: enquiries received, enquiries that matched what you sell, quotations or appointments created, and orders. Cost per order is the only figure that settles the Google against Meta argument for your business, and it is usually different from what the industry says it should be.

Set the reporting up before you start spending, because attribution added later never covers the first three months. A spreadsheet with source, date, enquiry, outcome and value is enough to begin with.

What to do next

Write down the top five things you sell. Next to each, mark whether a stranger would type it into Google. If most of them would, your money belongs on search, and your Meta budget belongs on retargeting. If most would not, Meta is the starting point and your job is creative, not keywords. If you want that judgement made against your own enquiry records rather than in the abstract, tell us what you need.

Questions

Questions owners ask.

Can we run both with a small budget?
Below roughly a lakh a month in total media spend, split attention rather than budget. Run one platform properly for eight weeks, learn what a real enquiry costs there, then add the second. Two half-funded campaigns teach you nothing about either.
Why is our Meta cost per lead so low but nothing converts?
Because a form filled inside Facebook takes two taps and no thought. The lead is cheap because the intent is cheap. Judge Meta on cost per qualified enquiry after your team has called them, never on cost per form fill.
Should we use Meta lead forms or send people to our website?
Lead forms bring volume and poor quality. Website landing pages bring fewer and better. If your team can call within five minutes, lead forms can work. If your team calls the next day, send traffic to a landing page instead.
Is LinkedIn better than both for B2B?
It is better for reaching a specific job title in a specific industry, and it costs several times more per click. For B2B with a long cycle, LinkedIn suits awareness and list building while Google search catches the moment somebody is actually sourcing.

From the blog

More notes for owners.

Your next practical step

Tell us what you are trying to grow, and we will read it before we call.

Eight short steps, mostly taps. Skip anything you would rather answer on the call.